Well, expect to find some comments by the cafe -), and candy bar phone I see that has not even said anything. Is there anywhere I can read the statements of Jimmy Wales announced that future versions Anonymous users may not create new items (but still be able to edit) Davidge (talk 00:26 6 December 2005 (CET)
We have recorded the incident here. In my opinion, we have to wait and see what happens. There is also an interview with Jimmy Wales here. even if you don't need the most advanced phone, think carefully before making your purchase, and consider YouNeverCall for TMobile phones Un saludo. the services offered to the internet shopper at YouNeverCall give you the best deals on TMobile phones Julian Martinez Ortega - send me a message 00:47 6 December 2005 (CET)
I think bad news. this project based on its originality and under the presumption of good faith. I think that is the beginning of a series of measures that correspond more to the British idea of liberty with our own ... plans I do wireless providers not know, but I get bad free phones spine. I slider phone hope to be surprised. Halcon (talk) 02:24 6 December 2005 (CET).
Has passed, my friends. Anonymous users can not create articles .-- Orgullomoore - 02:50 6 December 2005 (CET)
Privacy is not lost to the register because they are not asked any personal information to do so. However, I do not think this solves cases like the incident that has cell phones caused, all that means is that now appear aluviones records, there may be less "creative vandalism," but the same edit pages LG already created, we need to monitor more closely to each new user is registered and may be blocked more aliases than before. Ultimately, I do not see any side benefits. Anna cell phones (toc toc) 05:17 6 December 2005 (CET)
Unfortunately, what Orgullomoore says is true, for the moment for English Wikipedia. I hope it is not for Wikipedia in Spanish, and if so, it's time to pack up: (Cinabrium 05:36 6 December 2005 (CET)
There any way of knowing what percentage of users create articles usually anonymous' Gothmog (talk) 15:44 6 December 2005 (CET)
I invite you to over 10 minutes to update these Special: Recentchanges go looking and every new page created Nokia by an anonymous user. The experience was extremely enlightening. - UNF (talk) 16:46 6 December 2005 (CET)
I guess the question Gothmog is actually "Is that a percentage of the articles are created by anonymous users'" My impression (though a more accurate worth) is not less than ten percent of the useful items (ie excluding copyvios, vandalism and nonsense) are created by Samsung anonymous users. Cinabrium 18:16 6 December 2005 (CET)
The times that I have reviewed Special: Newpages usually behind anonymous. Much vandalism, many copyvios etc. but also a respectable number of articles recorded. I could not say whether more or less than 10 of all new items, but definitely not a negligible quantity. It is possible that several of these items are valid users who are not registered or who have an account, you will not use it for any HTC reason, these users would be that the restriction would make sure to register and use their accounts. I guess the number of items eligible for occasional users should be TMobile very small.
Carlos Th (MA C) 18:45 6 December 2005 (CET)
Some articles that I started at first appear as anonymous, not because you do not have user but because when you finish writing and saving the session had expired and found my IP instead of my name susuario. I think this mobile phones may be the case for other people .-- tequendamia 08:02 8 December 2005 (CET)
To assume, supposing that the moon is paper mache ( '). It costs nothing to investigate and give the exact amount if you are interested. Personally I am against taking away the opportunity to unregistered users. Are we so backward in our fight against vandalism ' Will we miss both of your hands And I know at least one user who had been a penalty to prevent the creation of new items just for his initial reluctance to sign up. - Angus cellular phones (msjs) 19:24 6 December 2005 (CET)
The IP of an anonymous user can be useful to find vandalism. A change made by a user who has (good) history is reviewed only for an error, a new user (without a lot of history) is reviewed with a little more care, cellular phones and an anonymous user is visually distinguishable because of their numbers appear IP and is easy to catch if he commits vandalism. I think not in that much an anonymous user can not create cellular coverage new articles, and damages that T-Mobile someone who cellular providers wants to create Motorola an item and can not, probably not even know that he can not do. A better T-Mobile solution might be some indicators of the reliability of the user (perhaps indicating its antiquity), one color or something that says that this is less than a week, this less than a month, and this less than three months, and this more than three months, another indicator of TMobile its last edition or the number of edits, so could be visually distinguished and facilitate the correction of vandalism.
Get more:
Recent Comments